I'm all for innovation in fiction, but here's why We Tell Stories doesn't work, and why I don't expect the website to still be around in a year's time, if even that long. Fiction is a passive experience; the internet is an interactive experience. If you tell a story where you keep having to click 'next' just to watch a silly blue line scroll across a map, you lose your reader in five minutes flat, because it's a hell of a lot more 'immersive' to just read the damn story without any whistles and bells attached. That's why ereaders have proved so popular, despite their prohibitive cost and associated software/format problems; they come the closest to recreating the passive experience of reading an actual paper book. I don't want to have to come up with the names of characters for stories, because that's the writer's job, to draw me into a world of their creation. If I have to keep coming up with names, I'm going to get annoyed and bored. Which I did, by the way. Don't believe me? Next time you're in the pub and someone's telling a really good story, see if it's improved by them showing you a google map of where they went on that particular day. Er, no.
That's not to say I'm entirely against it. Like I say, innovation is a good thing, and experimenting is always worthwhile. However, as most scientists will tell you, most experiments provide 'fail' results. Where I can see some of these fiction models working is with very young children, where story-time is in fact a collaborative process between child and parent. I'd have loved something like this as a wee kid, and obviously slanted for my age. But 'We Tell Stories', I'm afraid, isn't it, and what particularly set alarm bells ringing was a Mr Hon's statement (according to the BBC report where I first learned of the site, anyway) that '"E-books are boring - they are just taking a manuscript and turning it into a PDF.'
Oh dear. And I suppose reading is a bit boring too, isn't it, Mr Hon? Here's the deal; if you need bells and whistles to persuade you to sit down and read a story, then frankly, nothing's going to make you want to read it. Not even that, er, great aid to reading, Google Maps.
3 comments:
Yeah, you're right, Gary.
I took a look at the 21 Steps and after getting through the first chapter (about a dozen lines?)I got completely bored and almost started doing some writing of my own but then thought I'd respond to your blog :P
That Mr.Hon obviously is the type who doesn't read books and waits until the film version comes out so he hasn't got to make the effort to turn pages and get the old grey matter working. Yep, I think it will struggle to stay alive for even a year.
The only way I think something like this would hold my attention is if it was primarily all text-based and just gave you multiple avenues down which to proceed as the story evolved, thereby making the book a personal experience in which you have a hand in the final outcome. It has been done before in literature/theatre/video games etc but I'm not sure if it's ever been done via the internet.
I imagine it would be a big project though in terms of continuity and avoiding the pitfall of spending too much time writing the particular ending you would like the reader to achieve and not the others etc.
Best,
Bob
Yup, you're right. It's slow and not enough to hold my attention. Frankly it's boring. Give me a book any day of the week, or several on any day of the week I can just lounge about and read.
ever played interactive fiction on the computer? not web-stuff?
Post a Comment